Over the past decade,
cooperate influence in the media has steadily grown more, and more prominent.
As a result, the distinction
between editorial content and advertising has grown increasingly blurrier. And
this issue, had become especially problematic in regards to the news.
Dwelling in such an
information rich society, we are exposed to countless advertisements on a daily
basis. As such, many individuals grow accustomed to the constant barrage of
commercial endorsement, and advertisers are left with the challenge of breaking
through the noise and captivating their attention. This is where native
advertising comes into play.
At its very core, native
advertising is simply the masquerade of advertisements as legitimate new
stories. Seemingly normal pieces of content are stamped with tiny disclaimers and
contain messages that are often blatant endorsements.
A superb example of this would
be an article released last year by the New York Times on the subject of Women
Inmates.
The
feature, written by Melanie Deziel, was about women in prison and its intended audience as one might
expect were the readers of the New York Times and presumably those interested
in the article’s subject matter.
Now, the sincere nature of the
article, coupled with its use of statistical claims and statistics, casts it as
a serious piece of journalism, however in reality, it is nothing more than an
elaborate paid post.
As the disclaimer at the very
top of the article highlights, the article is a promotion for the second season
of Orange in the new Black. And one might ask, why the advertisers choose to
showcase the show in such a manner.
The article dwells into a
matter very similar to the plot of the TV show it’s advertising, and in many
regards acts as a twisted call to action. Having read the article, readers are
left wanting to follow through and subtle references scattered throughout the text
hint to a solution; watch Orange is New Black.
Now, this post acts as a more
positive example of native advertising: the reporting is real and the sponsored
branding is kept to low.
However, not all advertisers
are so lenient, and this form of advertising has compromised the integrity of the
news, as consumers can increasingly not tell the difference between what is credible
information and mere cooperate jargon.
Recent studies further support
this and show that less than half of visitors to news sites could distinguish
native advertising from actual news and of course they can’t because native
advertising, is supposed to blend in.
No comments:
Post a Comment